Now I haven't just been reading the news, I've been reading with unabated diligence. While I sip my morning coffee, when I sit down in the afternoon for a mid-day brainstorming session, or any other time that should be dedicating to researching or writing, I end up absorbing information from CNN, NPR, FOX News (yes, it's true), BBC, USA Today, CNet, etc., etc. While in the heart of election season I'm betting you can guess what I've been reading about . Yeah, war heros, domestic Arab terrorists and pigs, er, pitbulls with lipstick.

The new-found hobby has been beyond my abilities of personal restraint, and my wife would see me glued to the computer screen, roll her eyes and say things like, "Are you still reading the news?", or, "Are you reading the news again?", or, "You've developed a serious addiction and need help." I'd become so intoxicated with the words of the media that I had to literally restrain myself from getting near my laptop in order to process all the informational analysis on the politico 'straight talk', rhetoric and 'stump speeches'.
As I refelcted on my mass media overload I came to realize a common theme in the way political pundits were covering this election. If a campaign is going well, it has been mostly rewarded with positive press attention, i.e. McCain/Palin directly following the RNC, or Barack Obama ever since the Palin hype slid back into its dank hole. Does that mean McCain has been short-changed by the media like he claims? Maybe it does. But the Obama camp seems to be a smooth running machine that doesn't veer out of control when the Republicans dump an oil slick in their path. Does that mean he runs a more honorable campaign than Jon McCain? I don't know. What I do know is that the media seems to have wholeheartedly embraced Obama while depicting McCain as desperate, and to use Obama's catch-phrase, "out of touch."
Not only do I think this is bad journalism, but I also think it is part of the reason a candidate like McCain, or John Kerry in 2004, gets put on their heels and has to come back throwing wild punches, thus prompting negative attention from the press. Presidential campaigns with momentum nearly always get the blessing of political reporters, and its a jaded practice that leaves people like you and I to filter through the muck in order to get to the truth. Who has time to do that....oh, wait.
I'll be happy when this is all over and I can go back to reading uninspired columns about the distribution of $700,000,000,000 into our defunct financial system, the debate on how to deal with climate change and, of course, celebrity gossip--you know, the stuff that dominates headlines when people don't feel as though the future of our country is a stake any longer. I, for one, know I'll have more time on my hands come November 5th.

Onward and upward America. Go Obama.